Highlights
-
PRP vs. Arthroscopy: Study shows PRP offers better long-term outcomes for knee osteoarthritis.
-
PRP or Stem Cells?: Dr. DeMers shares insights on choosing the right treatment for OA.
-
Grow Your Practice: 5 tips to build referral networks with local specialists.
-
Conversations in REGEN: Register for today’s session with Dr. John Ferrell.
-
BOB Live at IOF: Save the date for Feb 27, 2025, in Scottsdale, AZ—an event you don’t want to miss!
Today’s Research Article
A Comparative Study of Osteoarthritis Knee Arthroscopy versus Intra-Articular Platelet Rich Plasma Injection: A Randomised Study
Singh, MS Orth, Trivedi, MS Orth, Kumar, MS Orth, Mishra, MS Orth, Ahmad, MD, Ayar, MS Orth, Kataria, MS Orth, Kharbanda, MS Orth
Summary:
This randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections and arthroscopic debridement in managing knee osteoarthritis in 70 patients. Results demonstrated that PRP significantly improved pain (VAS scores) and function (WOMAC scores) up to 9 months, especially in patients with mild to moderate osteoarthritis (KL Grade 2). While PRP maintained its benefits longer, arthroscopy showed limited and diminishing effects over time, with no significant improvement beyond 9 months.
The study highlights PRP’s role as a regenerative therapy using growth factors to promote tissue repair and regeneration, showing better overall outcomes compared to arthroscopy. PRP was well-tolerated without significant complications, making it a safe and effective alternative for osteoarthritis management, particularly for patients seeking non-surgical options.
Talking Points for Doctors to Patients: Why Choose PRP
